Olympics. But like L’Oreal shampoo, Is it worth it?

 

Trott and Kenny v3

So the moaning starts. We Brits are rarely happy. It appears we’ve been too successful at the Olympics. Instead of finishing as chipper, chirpy also-rans, we bagged a bumper haul of medals to better all of our past Olympic successes. Start the wailing and gnashing. We don’t like success. Especially when it costs.

But the long and short of these things, is that success does cost. You can’t build successful programmes without procuring decent services, top to bottom. Stadia. Facilities. Equipment. Coaching. Dieticians. Sports Scientists. Physiotherapists. Pyschology. Technical wear. Transport. Entry fees. It all rather adds up.

In cycling’s case, you witness this at each stage. Bristling with confidence and courtesy of funding, BC now has a relentless marketing machine pushing its message. Club administered Go-ride programmes encourage adults and kids to ride. Extremely professional coaching and development programmes have matured nicely. Support given to grass roots sport. Recently I completed the first stage of becoming a cyclo-cross commissaire – a 1 hour online module ahead of attending the full course. I was very impressed with its professionalism (the coaching materials and support have all been similarly excellent). It’s a long way from my memories of sports as a kid; grubby rugby changing rooms, ancient coaching staff puffing on woodbines, fourth hand kit etc.  Granted all this enabling stuff costs money. But is it worth it?

I’d argue ‘yes’, for these reasons:

(i) Interest in sport encourages participation. Participation improves health, wellbeing and socialisation.

(ii) We have a growing obesity problem that will cost future generations far more money, time and pain than the sums spent on developing sport.

(iii) Sporting success is likely to have direct economic benefit (from rises in stocks and shares to booming health industries).

(iv) In the case of cycling, I am also convinced that sporting success has been an enabler for getting more people to ride. The urban cycling landscape has changed since 2012, both in terms of modal share and debate/action on infrastructure (and of course we’d like it change much, much more).

(v) Olympic success undeniably gives the nation a boost. We are fed a media diet of fear, terror and pain on a relentless 24 hour basis (not to mention Brexit and financial gloom). The Olympics gave us a welcome respite. For 2 weeks at least, we could enjoy some uplifting scenes.

For me, the only question that surrounds lottery funded investment is accessibility. Cycling is moderately easy to get involved with (BMX in particular), but does require initial outlays and ongoing travel/investment, while at the most extreme end of the spectrum, Equestrian and modern Pentathlon are different stories entirely (I very much doubt the next Olympic dressage champ will come from Brixton or Moss Side). But I don’t want to nit pick. Overall,  the huge investment and commitment from UK government via lottery funding would appear to be worth it.

3 replies »

  1. I think that Jenkins has a point. The coverage was a bit one eyed-for example, I still cannot find a full replay of the 1500m online or via their website except via an Arabian channel (presumably there was no Brit in that final). I couldn’t keep my eyes open past 11pm that night.

    While the time difference is not the fault of the BBC, they could have rearranged their coverage better instead of chopping and changing channels-maybe even dedicate 1 channel to Olympic coverage withe red button for the other live sports (that, BTW was well done).

    I agree with you on the money thing though. You can’t be the best without adequate investment though-I didn’t see any comment from him about how much the US pour into their track and field athletes through the collegiate system and elsewhere. I assume that the same filtering down and inspiration occurs year on year and through each Olympiad as they consistently consistent in their medal hauls.

    What’s important for me is that the funding continues as exposure to success of this type inspired my kids to try something different, want to be better, to be active, be healthy doing it…and going trackside or roadside to watch these people do it in the flesh

    • Absolutely right. The inspiration from the games is huge (especially for youngsters). The coverage was indeed myopic, but having been in the States during the 92 Olympics and France this year, the same is true elsewhere.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s